New Member Area New to Toyota Camry Forums? Stop in tell us about you.

87-91 wagons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-06-2016, 05:48 PM
g3bill's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 27
Default 87-91 wagons?

for wagon, i looked on sites for mileage differences from 6 & 4 cyl EPA listed for the 2.0 as 22city 24avg. 27hwy, for the 2.5 was 17city 19avg. 22hwy, think this is correct but wonder what it is in the real world, are the v6's that bad really?
 

Last edited by g3bill; 08-06-2016 at 06:09 PM.
  #2  
Old 08-09-2016, 10:56 AM
toyomoho's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PTW
Posts: 14,779
Default

This seems low.

The 4-cylinder should average 26 and the V-6 around 24.
 
  #3  
Old 08-12-2016, 10:07 AM
g3bill's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 27
Default

Thanks, I wasn't clear, sorry. Not wondering so much about the average, more the real world highway mpg for trips. Just guessing but would think a V6 wouldn't need ya to put the pedal to the floor near as much as a 4cyl? any thoughts .

2.0 4cyl 115hp,,, 2.5 6cyl 156hp
 

Last edited by g3bill; 08-12-2016 at 10:13 AM.
  #4  
Old 08-12-2016, 08:49 PM
toyomoho's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PTW
Posts: 14,779
Default

This 4-cylinder was designed as an around town family car engine. It is more fuel efficient. On long trips the 4-cylinder can get 29-32 MPG. Average 26.

The V-6 is the more performance engine. It has always gotten less MPG.

The Alltrac 4-cylinder 22-24 average. 24-27 hwy.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Byron Nash
New Member Area
4
06-03-2013 08:56 AM



Quick Reply: 87-91 wagons?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.