Should I buy a 97 4cyl Camry?
#12
RE: Should I buy a 97 4cyl Camry?
ORIGINAL: sestivers
I used to think that a V6 wore more slowly and thus lasted longer than an I4, but it's not actually true. The V6 is normally under less load in proportion to its maximum output, but that does not necessarily mean that it's being worn less.
The design of an inline engine is inherently more reliable than a V-type engine not only because of fewer parts, but also because the crankshaft is supported by an extra bearing. This makes the inline engine structurally superior and normally run "smoother" than a V-type. The old Lexus I6 was about as good as an engine can get as far as quietness.
Sometimes, the repair costs are much higher for a V6 engine because it takes up more room in the engine compartment and thus takes much longer to complete the same job.
There is nothing wrong with the Camry's V6, it's not measurably less reliable than the I4. But for the OP, it doesn't add any benefits for the extra costs (gas and repairs).
Also, I agree that $6500 for a 1997 Camry is too high. That's how much I paid for a 2000 Camry recently (although with about 4X the mileage).
I used to think that a V6 wore more slowly and thus lasted longer than an I4, but it's not actually true. The V6 is normally under less load in proportion to its maximum output, but that does not necessarily mean that it's being worn less.
The design of an inline engine is inherently more reliable than a V-type engine not only because of fewer parts, but also because the crankshaft is supported by an extra bearing. This makes the inline engine structurally superior and normally run "smoother" than a V-type. The old Lexus I6 was about as good as an engine can get as far as quietness.
Sometimes, the repair costs are much higher for a V6 engine because it takes up more room in the engine compartment and thus takes much longer to complete the same job.
There is nothing wrong with the Camry's V6, it's not measurably less reliable than the I4. But for the OP, it doesn't add any benefits for the extra costs (gas and repairs).
Also, I agree that $6500 for a 1997 Camry is too high. That's how much I paid for a 2000 Camry recently (although with about 4X the mileage).
#13
RE fuel system sv22r 89 4cyl Camry?
maybe someone out there may help find out why my camry is over fueling. it is a sv22r motor fitted whith a carb. it is flooding and running rough as though the choke is stuck on but no.i don't know much about the fuel system. maybe someone may be able to help thanks pete
#14
RE: Should I buy a 97 4cyl Camry?
A thougt came to mind whilei was driving- in a V6.. the RPM doesn't need to travel as 4-4.2K rpm like a 4 cyl. would indaily driving So in turn-WOuldn't that also post a better preservation of the engine?-
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Amekaji87
Engine & Internal
7
12-04-2011 02:39 PM