Anyone owned a 87-91 then a 92-95??
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8
Anyone owned a 87-91 then a 92-95??
I ask because I wonder if anyone else feels the same way I do.
The 1991 with a 4cyl 5 speed is one of the best midsized cars I ever drove or owned.
By comparison, the 92, 93, 95, 97 and even the 2013...are all "tin cans" by comparison.
The doors on a LE 1991 model do not make me think "BUDWEISER" when they close. Interior is quieter. Goes around corners flat. Steering is MUCH more responsive.
Wish it had the room of the 92 though.
Anyone else feel this way?
The 1991 with a 4cyl 5 speed is one of the best midsized cars I ever drove or owned.
By comparison, the 92, 93, 95, 97 and even the 2013...are all "tin cans" by comparison.
The doors on a LE 1991 model do not make me think "BUDWEISER" when they close. Interior is quieter. Goes around corners flat. Steering is MUCH more responsive.
Wish it had the room of the 92 though.
Anyone else feel this way?
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,695
From: Maine
I can't say about the years you listed but I can speak for my '07. I like the sound of the doors shutting in my car. They have a nice thud sound and the fit is perfect. I would not want to get a ding in the door though as the doors do not have a lot of weight to them so I imagine the metal is thin. The steering is on the numb side but not too bad and overall the interior is nice and ergonomic with only slight hints of cheapness. Just my opinion though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post